Why Good Designers Still Create Inaccessible Websites: 7 Key Insights

From Moocchen, the free encyclopedia of technology

We all know designers are good people. They care about usability and want to include everyone. Yet, we see websites and apps daily that are difficult to read, navigate, or use for people with disabilities. How can this be? The answer lies not in ill intent but in the sheer volume of knowledge designers must juggle. In this listicle, we'll explore the paradox of good designers creating inaccessible experiences, and propose a practical solution rooted in cognitive psychology. Let's dive into seven key insights that can help bridge the gap between good intentions and truly inclusive design.

1. The Good Intentions Paradox

No designer wakes up thinking, "I hope someone can't read this text" or "Let's make this confusing." Actually, most designers are deeply empathetic. Yet, the gap between intention and outcome is wider than we think. The problem isn't malice—it's the complexity of modern design. We juggle colors, typography, layout, performance, and trends. Accessibility often gets pushed aside not because it's unimportant, but because it's one more thing to remember. This paradox is the starting point for understanding why we need better systems, not better intentions.

Why Good Designers Still Create Inaccessible Websites: 7 Key Insights

2. Accessibility Is a Life-or-Death Issue

It’s easy to think of accessibility as a nice-to-have, but it directly affects life events. As Aral Balkan argues in his essay This Is All There Is, even a simple bus timetable app can have life-or-death consequences. Imagine missing your daughter’s fifth birthday because the schedule was unreadable, or failing to say goodbye to a dying grandmother because navigation was too confusing. These aren’t hypotheticals—they happen. When we design poorly, we risk cutting people off from moments that matter most. Accessibility isn't just compliance; it's empathy in action.

3. The Information Overload Problem

Designers today are expected to be experts in everything: visual design, UX, performance, SEO, responsive design, and accessibility. The list of guidelines from WCAG, ADA, and others runs into hundreds of pages. How can anyone remember all of it? The problem isn't a lack of resources—it's a lack of retrievability. When designing, we need the right information at the right time. Currently, that information is scattered across books, articles, and checklists. We need a way to make accessibility knowledge instantly accessible during the design process itself.

4. Jakob Nielsen's Heuristics: A Forgotten Tool

Long before modern design tools, Jakob Nielsen developed ten usability heuristics in the 1990s. These heuristics are still relevant today, but they’re rarely applied to the designer’s own workflow. For instance, Heuristic #6 is Recognition rather than Recall. Originally, it meant that users shouldn’t have to remember information from one part of the interface to another. But we can reframe it for designers: make accessibility criteria visible and easily retrievable while designing. Instead of memorizing all the rules, embed them into the design environment.

5. Recognition Over Recall for Designers

Let’s put the reframed heuristic into practice. Imagine a design tool that highlights contrast ratios as you pick colors, or warns you when a font size falls below a readable threshold. This is recognition—the tool surfaces information when needed, reducing cognitive load. Designers can then make informed decisions without flipping through manuals. The same principle applies to team processes: include accessibility checks in your design reviews, use automated testing, and create pattern libraries with accessible components. By designing for recognition, we reduce the barrier to creating inclusive products.

6. A Web for Everyone: A Practical Resource

One of the best resources to internalize accessibility is the book A Web for Everyone by Sarah Horton and Whitney Quesenbery. It provides clear, actionable principles for designing accessible user experiences. The book doesn’t just list rules—it shows how to integrate accessibility into every stage of design, from research to prototyping. For example, it emphasizes inclusive personas that represent people with disabilities, ensuring their needs are considered from the start. This book is a perfect companion to the heuristic approach: it gives designers both the what and the how of inclusive design.

7. From Proposal to Practice: Making Accessibility a Habit

So what’s the takeaway? We don’t need better designers—we need better tools and processes that make inclusive design easier. Start by auditing your current design environment: where do accessibility issues often arise? Then implement small changes, like adding a contrast checker plugin or including a screen reader test in your QA. Over time, these habits become second nature. The goal isn’t perfection but progress. Every step toward making your designs more accessible is a step toward a more inclusive web. Remember, it’s not about blame—it’s about building a world where everyone can participate.

In conclusion, the gap between good designers and bad websites is real but solvable. By shifting from memory to recognition, from overload to heuristics, and from good intentions to practical tools, we can create digital experiences that truly serve everyone. Let’s make accessibility not an afterthought, but a fundamental part of how we design.